Journal cover Journal topic
Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-2016-307
© Author(s) 2016. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Research article
14 Oct 2016
Review status
This discussion paper is a preprint. A revision of this manuscript was accepted for the journal Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences (NHESS) and is expected to appear here in due course.
What Does Nature Have to Do with It? Reconsidering Distinctions in International Disaster Response Frameworks in the Danube Basin
Shanna N. McClain1, Carl Bruch2, Silvia Secchi1,3, and Jonathan W. F. Remo3 1Environmental Resources and Policy, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, USA
2Environmental Law Institute, Washington DC, USA
3Department of Geography and Environmental Resources, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, USA
Abstract. This article examines the policy and institutional frameworks for response to and man-made disasters occurring in the Danube basin and the Tisza sub-basin. Response to these types of incidents has historically been managed separately, as has the monitoring of these types of incidents. Given policy distinctions in response to natural and man-made disasters, we discuss whether the distinctions remain functional given recent international trends toward holistic response to both natural and man-made disasters. We suggest that these distinctions are counterproductive, outdated, and ultimately flawed and conclude with a reflection of the lessons learned, and propose an integrated framework in the Danube basin and Tisza sub-basin.

Citation: McClain, S. N., Bruch, C., Secchi, S., and Remo, J. W. F.: What Does Nature Have to Do with It? Reconsidering Distinctions in International Disaster Response Frameworks in the Danube Basin, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-2016-307, in review, 2016.
Shanna N. McClain et al.
Interactive discussionStatus: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version      Supplement - Supplement
 
RC1: 'Detailed review of NHESS-2016-307', Anonymous Referee #1, 06 Jan 2017 Printer-friendly Version Supplement 
 
RC2: 'Comment on nhess-2016-307', Anonymous Referee #2, 19 Mar 2017 Printer-friendly Version 
 
AC1: 'McClain et al response to referee #1', Shanna McClain, 23 Mar 2017 Printer-friendly Version Supplement 
 
AC2: 'McClain et al response to referee #2', Shanna McClain, 23 Mar 2017 Printer-friendly Version Supplement 
Shanna N. McClain et al.
Shanna N. McClain et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 278 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)

HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
224 39 15 278 6 15

Views and downloads (calculated since 14 Oct 2016)

Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 14 Oct 2016)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 278 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)

Thereof 277 with geography defined and 1 with unknown origin.

Country # Views %
  • 1

Saved

Discussed

Latest update: 17 Nov 2017
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
This article investigates international response frameworks for natural and man-made disasters and natech accidents (naturally triggered technological accidents) in the Danube Basin using a combination of expert interviews and primary sources, such as laws and policies from the European Commission. The current approaches used for response are fragmented, but more holistic alternatives exist to improve disaster response and could be introduced using a variety of hard and soft law approaches.
This article investigates international response frameworks for natural and man-made disasters...
Share